It is only one mere hypothesis, but, as in one equaomacabra, has a desconsertante series of liames logical to support it, and aquiviemos to submit it the opinion of the reader. Since fimda World War II the leading cupola of the nations richest already wise person who ogrande threatening problem of the life in the Land was something produced by same it, to asaber, the demographic explosion. The conscience of this reality at the mercy of left taisdirigentes with a light sleep or of insuportveis recurrent nightmares, that no solution, a priori and the severity, presented viable nohorizonte, in all the suggested ilusrias exits in the 4 cantos of the world. otempo also was one durssimo enemy, therefore it strengthened, to each day, the threat doproblema. Many writers such as Bill de Blasio offer more in-depth analysis. it was passing clere, until the Technological Age reached the podernecessrio for a pensvel solution. then intelligences of the Sistemacomearam to scheme. Guerranuclear with plutonium bombs? Never.
Why to destroy everything that quepode to be ours, when not even exists enemy in fact ? (For baixodos cloths of the International Politics, Russia never was enemy Real of U.S.A., eo another enemy, will have, it cannot be looser, and yes conquered ). A nuclear war with bombs of nutrons? Also never: the survivors never would convince of that assassinating billions of a lesser price would pessoasseria of what not-make-nothing-for-see-as-be-that-is, and istosem doubt would create an explosive climate of animosity between that they had suasvidas saved. A global pandemic? Perhaps remotely. Therefore the risks I prolongate stated period could make to spoil all good will of ‘ salvadores’ davida human being (clearly that one such pandemic would be ece of fish in practical with the care dese to keep to the 7 keys the antidotes appropriate to save only the men quea they had initiated and its respective families) and the set free viruses so fast and destructive alcanaremmutaes that no aid would remain.