It is possible then that politics should raise the tax to the added value (VAT) to the non-agricultural sector, while that for the agricultural sector it should be reduced to the minimum possible. What seems adverse is subsidize the import of agricultural goods or fix prices to national agricultural goods, because it deprimiria the national production and medium term effect can be rather unfavourable to the poor groups in society. Policies of transfer of income these policies can help to expand the possibility of non-agricultural employment in sectors with best salaries; to achieve the transfer of persons engaged in work in the field to the industrial parks near urban areas, then the agricultural added value would be distributed among one smaller number of rural people; However, this transfer of workers from the countryside to the industrial zones, requires that the process of industrialization is broad enough and especially stimulating tasks that privilege the use of less skilled workers and technologies with less capital intensity, i.e.: an industrialization with a less intensive use of machinery and sophisticated technologies, while it may hit short-term productivity and efficiency. Policies to change the relationship between capital cost and the cost of labor alter the relationship between the cost of capital and the wage could apparently benefit to labor, but the policies that achieve changes structural production have, in general, little distributive impact of income. Most of the cities in Latin America, with the exception of Brasilia in Brazil and Ciudad Guayana in Venezuela, grew without any urban planning. Movement and distribution of populations in space and equipment and paths by social demands and without any plan conceived arose. There have been very few cities where the order became more conscious and systematic. Urban land speculation was the standard of those who urbanizaron the cities and the lack of well-paid jobs in the rural zone, produced an avalanche of people towards cities in search of a life expectancy. .

The only thing that would tolerate is being bombarded by lightning to Iran (which is almost impossible to happen), but not a similar to the Iraq stalemate. Although his more realistic speech makes you lose the votes of more progressive sectors of society. Barak Obama: it is the second in intention vote of the Democratic Party. An element in favour, within his party, is that the day carried the vote in the Senate on the Iranian Revolutionary Guard was absent. Obama focused their proposals on cutting taxes on the middle class and the increase of those citizens who have higher incomes. However, he announced that he would invade Pakistan if President Pervez Musharraf failed to control Islamic militants who sympathize with the Taliban. His strategy in Iraq is to gradually withdraw troops.

Believes that the presence of United States.UU. causes more violence, and promised that it will not use the army on humanitarian issues. Bill Richardson: the New Mexico Governor ventured into a controversial topic: reported that it will lift the embargo to Cuba. Presented, also his education plan, that plan to finance with the cut of funds for weapon systems from the period of the Guerra cold promised that goes to withdraw troops from Iraq because they contribute to ethnic violence. In addition, criticized Hillary, Obama and John Edwards by planning the withdrawal of forces from combat in Iraq, but leaving in place other similar. Only the Marines would remain to protect the Embassy in Baghdad John Edwards: former Senator from North Carolina and former candidate for Vice President in 2004. You don’t have many chances to win his opponents in the primaries.

Like the rest of the candidates, pointing his criticism to Hilary, who is more intention to vote has. The main problem with Republicans Republicans profile is know how peel off of the official discourse and the unpopular invasion of Iraq. All slander President Bush, but do not deny that they would act militarily in Pakistan if the situation of the Islamic militants were extreme, although they criticize Obama by have been encouraged to make this statement public. In general, the Republicans not approaching ethnic minorities, with the exception of Cubans, that Traditionally they choose candidates from this party. Rudolf Giuliani: he heads the Republican party polls. It has for the have reduced 56% the rate of crime while he was Mayor of New York. He is the only Republican who does not consider illegal immigration as a federal crime grave, and brags of having developed a computer system that prevents it. Mitt Romney: the main subject of the former Governor of Massachusetts are the 12 million illegal immigrants, who are mostly Mexican. His greatest fight with Giuliani is based on who best controlled taxes when he touched them to govern their respective districts. Fred Thompson: is the candidate that conservatives they would choose and which closer to the ideology of Bush lies. Mildly criticized the war in Iraq, because if it does not it has no chances to win in the primaries. You have positions very traditional, although on several occasions manifested in an ambiguous manner to the legalization of abortion, what removed you much of their voters. To find out who will be the two candidates end will have to wait until the development of primary elections that begin in New Hampshire in December this year and ending in Montana in June of next year.