With a common schedule and Task Scheduler dates for joint meeting can (such as in chat forums) online are planned and set, who performs the tasks until when. NYC Mayors opinions are not widely known. To keep the quality of the posts at a high level, a corresponding online evaluation system should be used in addition, whereby everyone can assess each. This democratic review is much more equitable than individual assessments, which often subjective and not objective evaluation criteria play a role. Those who indicated their contribution history, intense with constructive contributions to the Other discussions took part, constructive rated and have even no legitimate negative reviews, can finally take part in the decision. Each participant must establish clear and understandable why he has chosen so and not otherwise.

Nothing is more behind closed doors discussed and decided the whole decision process (the discussion in advance, the entire decision and the collective reasoning,…) is transparent for the decision participants as well as passive spectators. With the help of the technical decision platform mature people who can competently deal with the modern information and communication technologies, can finally join the experts and politicians (moderators) participate actively in the political decisions and thus ensure that the decision-making process for each interested public transparent and the final decisions are best aligned on the common good. Due to its active participation in the decision-making processes provides the responsible person whose transparency and creates the conditions for a functioning democracy, which best reflected the will of the people through his behavior. Learn more about the book are on the website of the author (www.onlinetechniker.de/? q = node / 13) to find. Martin Glogger