Monday, February 23, 2009 increased during 2008 by 67% over the previous year, consultations and procedures relating to leases and housing issues. This was stated by the Secretary General of the Association of Maria de los Reyes Rueda Serrano after the conclusion of the comparative statistics conducted in 2007 and 2008. Over the past year there was an evident increase in the number of inquiries from individuals who attended the Association to be advised and if necessary ask for a lawyer for actions related to the issue of leasing and problems associated with housing. . Many landlords consulted their homes because they wanted to rent but were afraid empty. They showed their apprehensions since the Act of Urban Leases Act 29/1994 of November 29 does not protect them or pamper them too much, because it requires them to agree on a term that takes the time to five years, as foreseen in art. 9 LAU. Since even less time than is agreed, the contract is extended compulsory for the owner by annual installments if they so want the tenant. Must notify the landlord one month before the contract ended his desire not to prolong it, because otherwise the contract will be extended for annual periods up to three years more, if the tenant does not give up unilaterally.
Another possibility offered by the Act to make a seasonal lease, provided that their destination is different from meeting the continuing need for housing that provides the art. 2 of LAU. Can be for example a lease other than housing, hiring students, foreigners who come to pursue their studies of 1 year, a master, or companies that leased a house for a manager.
Filed under: News
| Tagged as: real estate planners
If the debtor pays the interest on the new rate, the proposal should be considered as adopted, and the transaction committed, given ch.ch. 2, 3 tbsp. 205, p. 2 art. 642 Civil Code of Ukraine (even in the absence of adequate evidence notification of the debtor), because the actual actions indicate acceptance of the offer. First, there is a change of interest rate and then sent a notification. Thus, if the loan agreement was signed to 10 January 2009 and in it the parties agreed that the bank has the right to unilaterally change the interest rate, then it is agreed by the parties. If the bank accepted the decision of 10 January 2009 (for confirmation of this legal fact relevant evidence), and the borrower has received notification after this date, it is only a mechanism for implementation of this agreement. In this case, it is important to a particular contract mechanism Implementation of this agreement: getting the message and, accordingly, the adoption of the proposal by the borrower, or the conclusion by signing an additional agreement on the interest rate increase. In any case, all the above circumstances (signing an additional agreement on the rate change, the message about the debtor's conduct of the parties after the interest rate changes, etc.) should be considered by the court in aggregate, but the determining factor in deciding the legality of such a change in the context of the Law 661 is precisely date the decision to change rates of the bank (namely 10.01.2009r.) Changing the interest rate on this basis, it is possible only in the event of a material change of circumstances, but not every circumstance, provided the contract may be considered such as materiality in itself provides a change of circumstances so that if the parties could have foreseen this, they would not have entered into a contract or put him on other conditions.
Filed under: News
| Tagged as: man and the law
The problem comes more and more not only since the Gottingen Declaration of agricultural and Veterinary Academy (AVA) in the Munsterland Horstmar empty not only since the Gottingen Declaration of the agricultural and Veterinary Academy (AVA) in the Munsterland Horstmar empty comes more and more the problem of the chronic form of a Botulinumtoxikose caused by Clostridium botulinum to the light of day. Animals get sick, but also pet owners become ill. And not taking seriously this policy and the agricultural associations. Prof. Dirk Dressler of the medical school has first described the transmission from animals to humans (zoonoses) and presented on the 9 main meeting of agricultural and Veterinary Academy (AVA) in Gottingen. 5% of German cattle farms were affected by the chronic botulism and would pose a risk for the food chain, so Prof. Dr. Helge Bohnel from Gottingen.
And the high risk of chronic Botulism in humans confirmed also Prof. Dressler (Hannover). Mrs Prof. Monika Kruger an seuchenhaftes event, sees in the creeping disease because it ill animals on a holding in a certain period of time and the disease spreads further in the operation, what however doesn’t seem so the Department of agriculture. “A disease under the animal diseases Act would not meet requirement”, from the Ministry of agriculture.
Infected animals can be slaughtered normally and get into the food chain, because the disease in slaughtered animals remain inconspicuous, meanwhile in the macroscopic veterinary investigation (the so-called meat inspection) they do not differ from normal animals. The MDR has in the show exactly (broadcast from the 20.4 2011-27th 2011) set up with the chronic botulism. An affected farmer reported by the factor disease of chronic Botulism in his dairy farm. He has lost more than 400 animals. The farmer family is ill. Here the link to the show: the Federal Agriculture Ministry sees until today no transferability of the animal on the People (zoonosis).
Filed under: News
| Tagged as: animals & plants